Exubera Insulin Litigation

Exubera Inhaled Insulin
  Exubera - Pfizer
  Exubera - Nektar
  Exubera Risks
  Exubera -
    Drug Litigation
  Exubera -
   Pulmonary Issues
  Exubera -
    FDA Approval
  Exubera -
    EU Approval
  Exubera - Canada
  Exubera - Clinical
    Drug Trials
  Exubera Sales
  Exubera Cost
  Exubera News
  Exubera - Physician
    Comments
  Exubera: Type 1
    Diabetes
  Exubera: Type 2
    Diabetes
  Exubera - U.K. NICE
    Analysis
  Diabetes Research
  Exubera - Breeze
    Study









Subscribe: Feeds
        Subscribe to the RDF (RSS 1.0) feed
        Add to your Google Home Page or Google Reader
        Add to your My Yahoo!
        Add to your My MSN
        Add to your My AOL
        Add to your My Feedster
        Add to your NewsGator
        Add to your Bloglines
        Add to your News Burst
        Subscribe to the blog's FeedBurner feed

Diabetes Drug Makers
  Eli Lilly & Co.
  Novo-Nordisk
  Sanofi Aventis
  MannKind Corporation
  Generex

Novo-Nordisk A/S v. Pfizer, Inc.
Exubera Patent Lawsuit

Drug Litigation Home > Pages 3 - 4 of 9 in Lawsuit

<< First Page   Previous   Next   Last Page >>
Dosage Control Delivery Enhanced by Controlling Total Inhaled Volume.” A copy of the '240 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit C.

                  11.        On January 2,2001, United States Patent No. 6,167,880 (the “'880 patent”) was duly and legally issued to Aradigm, as assignee ofIgor Gonda, Reid M. Rubsamen, and Stephen J. Farr, for an invention entitled “Inhaled Insulin Dosage Control Delivery Enhanced by Controlling Total Inhaled Volume.” A copy of the '880 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit D.

                  12.        On April 18, 2006, United States Patent No. 7,028,686 (the “'686 patent”) was duly and legally issued to Aradigm, as assignee of Igor Gonda, Reid M. Rubsamen, and Stephen J. Farr, for an invention entitled “Inhaled Insulin Dosage Control Delivery Enhanced by Controlling Total Inhaled Volume.” A copy of the '686 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit E.

                  13.        Collectively, the '581, '620, '240, '880 and the '686 patents will be referred to as the “patents-in-suit.” Novo is presently the owner of each of the patents-in-suit.

Pfizer's Infringing Activities

                  14.        On December 27, 2004, Pfizer submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") a New Drug Application ("NDA") No. 21-868 for Exubera (insulin human [rDNA origin]) Inhalation Powder, 1 mg and 3 mg, and Exubera Inhaler.

                  15.        Pfizer's NDA No. 21-868 provides for the use of its Exubera product in the treatment and control of diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia in adult patients.

- 3 -


                  16.        On January 27,2006, FDA approved Pfizer's NDA No. 21-868 for use as recommended in the Package Insert and Medication Guide submitted by Pfizer. The Package Insert and Medication Guide contain information about the insulin to be used with Exubera and instructions on the use of the Exubera Inhaler.

                  17.        Pfizer has announced plans to introduce Exubera for commercial sale in the United States in the beginning of September 2006.

                  18.        Upon information and belief, the use of Exubera by patients in the United States, according to the instructions provided by Pfizer, is a direct infringement of the patents-in-suit under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).

Public Announcement of the FDA Decision

                  19.        Pfizer has been, is and will be inducing and/or contributing to infringement of the patents-in-suit by making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing its Exubera product in the United States in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) and (c).

                  20.        Upon information and belief, Pfizer has been, is and will be directly infringing the patents-in-suit in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using its Exubera product to treat patients in the United States.

                  21.        Pfizer's direct, contributory and inducement of infringement of the patents-in-suit is willful, wanton and in disregard of Novo's rights under the patents-in-suit.

                  22.        As a result of Pfizer's infringing activity, Novo has suffered, is suffering and will continue-unless Pfizer is enjoined-to suffer irreparable harm for which there is no adequate remedy at law. Novo is thus entitled to a preliminary and

- 4 -


<< First Page   Previous   Next   Last Page >>

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 - 2006 BFLD, LLC – All rights reserved.