Exubera Insulin Litigation

Exubera Inhaled Insulin
  Exubera - Pfizer
  Exubera - Nektar
  Exubera Risks
  Exubera -
    Drug Litigation
  Exubera -
   Pulmonary Issues
  Exubera -
    FDA Approval
  Exubera -
    EU Approval
  Exubera - Canada
  Exubera - Clinical
    Drug Trials
  Exubera Sales
  Exubera Cost
  Exubera News
  Exubera - Physician
    Comments
  Exubera: Type 1
    Diabetes
  Exubera: Type 2
    Diabetes
  Exubera - U.K. NICE
    Analysis
  Diabetes Research
  Exubera - Breeze
    Study









Subscribe: Feeds
        Subscribe to the RDF (RSS 1.0) feed
        Add to your Google Home Page or Google Reader
        Add to your My Yahoo!
        Add to your My MSN
        Add to your My AOL
        Add to your My Feedster
        Add to your NewsGator
        Add to your Bloglines
        Add to your News Burst
        Subscribe to the blog's FeedBurner feed

Diabetes Drug Makers
  Eli Lilly & Co.
  Novo-Nordisk
  Sanofi Aventis
  MannKind Corporation
  Generex

Novo-Nordisk A/S v. Pfizer, Inc.
Exubera Patent Lawsuit

Drug Litigation Home > Pages 7 - 9 of 9 in Lawsuit

<< First Page   Previous     Last Page >>

                  37.        Pfizer has been, is and will be inducing and/or contributing to infringement of the '880 patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing its Exubera product in the United States, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 27l(b) and (c).

                  38.        Upon information and belief, Pfizer is, has been and will be infringing the ' 880 patent by using its Exubera product to treat patients in the United States, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).

COUNT V
(Infringement of the '686 patent)

                  39.        Novo repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 38 of its Complaint as though fully set forth herein.

                  40.        Novo owns all rights, title and interest to the validly issued '686 patent.

                  41.        Pfizer has been, is and will be inducing and/or contributing to infringement of the '686 patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing its Exubera product in the United States, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) and (c).

                  42.        Upon information and belief, Pfizer has been, is and will be infringing the '686 patent by using its Exubera product to treat patients in the United States, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a).

COUNT VI
(Declaratory Judgment of Infringement)

                  43.        Novo repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 42 of its Complaint as though fully set forth in this paragraph.

- 7 -


                  44.        An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between the parties with respect to the patents-in-suit and the respective rights and obligations of the parties in connection with those patents.

                  45.        In light of the actual controversy existing between the parties, Novo requests that the Court determine and declare the rights and obligations ofthe parties as follows:

  1. Pfizer has been, is and will be directly infringing and/or contributing to and/or inducing infringement of the patents-in-suit by making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing its product in the United States;

  2. Pfizer's manfucature, use, sale, offer to sell and/or importation of its Exubera product in the United States has been, is and will be directed toward directly infringing and/or contributing to and/or inducing infringement of the patents-in-suit; and

  3. Despite Pfizer's reasonable apprehension that Novo will enforce its patent rights against Pfizer, Pfizer will not change or modify its infringing activities to avoid infringing the patents-in-suit.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Novo demands judgment as follows:
  1. Adjudging, finding, and declaring that Pfizer has been, is and will be directly infringing and/or inducing and/or contributing to infringement of the patents-in-suit in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271;

  2. Preliminarily and permanently enjoining Pfizer, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and those persons in active concert or participation with them, from directly infringing and/or contributing to and/or inducing infringement of the patents-in-suit;

  3. - 8 -


  4. Awarding Novo damages in an amount to be determined at trial, together with interests and costs as fixed by this Court; all of those damages to be enhanced for willfulness in an amount up to treble the amount of compensatory damages, as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 284;

  5. Adjudging, finding, and declaring this to be an exceptional case entitling Novo to reasonable attorneys' fees, costs, and disbursements pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285; and

  6. Granting Novo such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.

Dated: New York, New York
           August 1, 2006

    _______________________________
David B. Tulchin (DT 5557)
Stephanie B. Wheeler (SW 7751)
James T. Williams (JW 5142)
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL
125 Broad Street
New York, NY 10004
(212) 558-4000

Robert Schaffer (RS 2866)
DARBY & DARBY
805 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
(212) 527-7700

Attorneys for Plaintiff Novo Nordisk A/S


- 9 -


<< First Page   Previous     Last Page >>

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 - 2006 BFLD, LLC – All rights reserved.